Rated: 0.80
Percentile vs all courts: 37.17%
Percentile vs Hard Court: 30.54%
Note that the lower the percentile, the faster the court is rated.
For an explanation on how court speed is assessed, click here.
This content is restricted! Match Statistics are only available to registered users of TennisInsight. Please click the key to register with TennisInsight and unlock your premium content right now.
Match W/L
This content is restricted! Match Statistics are only available to registered users of TennisInsight. Please click the key to register with TennisInsight and unlock your premium content right now.
0% (-)
Set W/L
0% (-)
0% (-)
Gm W/L
0% (-)
0%
Pts W/L
0%
0% (-)
TB W/L
0% (-)
0
TBs per Set
0
Service Statistics
0
Aces per Gm
0
0
DFs per Gm
0
0%
1st Serve %
0%
0%
1st Serve W%
0%
0%
2nd Serve W%
0%
0%
Service Pts W%
0%
Break Pts - Serve
0
BPs Saved per Gm
0
0
BPs Faced per Gm
0
0%
BP Save %
0%
0%
Service Hold %
0%
Return Statistics
0
Opp. Aces per Gm
0
0
Opp. DFs per Gm
0
0%
Opp. 1st Serve %
0%
0%
1st Return W%
0%
0%
2nd Return W%
0%
0%
Return Pts W%
0%
Break Pts - Return
0
BPs Won per Gm
0
0
BP Chances per Gm
0
0%
Break Pt W%
0%
0%
Opp Hold %
0%
Includes matches up to Nov 9 2008
Duration:
Draw:
Your Insight
Contribute Your Insight and see full comments from others - All you need is to be Registered and Logged in - then simply click on the relevant match, player or tournament and start sharing Your Insight!
Suffice to say I'm glad I missed it all but surprised at the one sided scoreline.
Well done Roger, don't know how you won here but you did. And commiserations to Andy Murray. Great tournament by him and certainly he will be a player who will learn from this loss and smack Federer next time.
Sep 8 2008 23:53:23 MrLeusk 3 (19) Posts 0 (56) Aces Login to give Aces
Agreed destroyer and even with the bad call, he should have been able to pull it together afterward. It was the same as last year; the steadiness of Federer prevails over the first time finalist.
Sep 8 2008 23:34:13 d.carson (Champion) 673 (3659) Posts 1643 (5579) Aces Login to give Aces
How can you describe that? Total brilliance from the real world No.1. Finished eh? You can all shut your mouths after you've swallowed your words. I had a few tears down my cheeks there after that I'm not afraid or ashamed to admit. One of the best wins if his career and what a way to set up 2009. Congratulations to Andy aswell on a fantastic fortnight and that will be the first of many Grand Slam final appearances. Look out for the headline in tomorrow's papers - Lucky 13 for Fed.
Sep 8 2008 23:06:52 bobsingh 82 (105) Posts 1 (101) Aces Login to give Aces
@MrLeusk: robbed by a bad line call hey? Well, I agree he would have won the point, but why not the challenge? Players can no longer use that excuse, and even if they were out of challenges they should use them more wisely. Federer was just a class above, Murray is almost as good a player of the game but you need the complete package and the Swiss has it.
Sep 8 2008 23:02:55 MrLeusk 3 (19) Posts 0 (56) Aces Login to give Aces
Federer is just a better slam finalist. Hats off to thedestroyer.
Set 1: Murray was stunned.
Set 2: Murray was robbed by a bad call and could not recover.
Set 3: Murray just didn't want to be humiliated.
Sep 8 2008 22:58:30 tennis-guru 533 (1621) Posts 661 (1880) Aces Login to give Aces
Tip: ATP Players can have an uncanny liking (or disliking as the case may be) of certain tournaments. These sorts of factors are not directly built into the Insight Tennis Model and often help explain sudden reversals of form.
Player Key: (seed/entry) player name (rank, match rating) (country)
: 0.37
